My Investigation of 9/11
Nineteen Islamic extremists hijacked four airplanes and carried out suicide
attacks on September 11, 2001 (9/11). Two of the planes were flown into the twin
towers of the World Trade Center (WTC) in New York, a third plane hit the
Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and the fourth plane crashed into a field in
Pennsylvania. Almost 3,000 people were killed during the terrorist attacks.
The US government conducted and reported on an investigation about the 9/11
terrorist attacks with the help of The National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST). The findings are presented in short here:
FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation. It states that the planes’ impact,
fire, and the heavy load of the buildings destroyed the WTC and the Pentagon.
The US government accused the leader of Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, for 9/11,
although they did not provide confirmatory evidence. They tried to seize Osama
Bin Laden but he was killed in the attempt which left many important questions
unanswered. The investigation failed to offer a convincing answer to the basic
question: why did these 19 terrorists do it?
the doors opened wide for conspiracy theories. A large number of people disagree
with the NIST report. They accuse the US government of destroying the WTC by
planting explosive devices in it and crushing the part of the Pentagon with a
missile. One of the leading organizations that accuse the government is
“Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.” The accusations of these organizations
are mainly presented on social networks such as Facebook and YouTube. Their
reports dominate the topic with thousands of documentaries trying to prove the
government did it. These reports are pseudoscientific so I have to disagree with
If we analyze motives for the terrorist attack, the government and mainstream US
media have found it in the fact that the suicidal terrorists did not like US
values, freedom and democracy. Those are really shallow and miserable statements
with which I strongly disagree. If they were even slightly objective, they would
find motive in the aggressive US foreign policy.
The alternative media has found motive for the alleged government’s involvement
in the demolition of the WTC in the desire to get the American people to support
the conquering of independent countries in the Middle East. The wars in the
Middle East were indeed triggered by 9/11. However, I do not see how US
government officials would be able to gain personally from the crime of
aggression on these independent countries.
While reading discussions related to 9/11 on various forums, I found the most
significant divide was between people who think the government did it and those
who do not believe it. I would say approximately half accuse the government of
9/11 and a half don’t. They fiercely argue about why 9/11 happened, who had an
interest in it, and finally who did it. They were not able to find convincing
answers and an explanation to which all might agree. It triggered me to see the
truth about 9/11. I performed my investigation which gave conclusive answers to
all of the questions regarding 9/11. I am presenting my findings here.
The twin towers. We all saw two planes hit the twin towers. The planes’
impacts critically damaged them. If the planes were twice as large, they would
probably have cut the towers in two. Then the fire weakened the construction of
the buildings until the huge loads of the buildings reached critical pressure,
causing the crash of the towers. That was the government’s explanation, with
which I agree. I wrote the article A
Clear Explanation Why the Twin Towers Collapsed in which I have
scientifically explained how the skyscrapers crushed down. I believe it is a
The alternative media on social networks have accused the US government of
planting explosives which destroyed the twin towers. Thousands of reports and
documentaries tried to convince people by using suggestive explanations such as
the buildings could never collapse if hit by a plane, or that the explosions
which destroyed the buildings were heard by many witnesses. Some of the
mainstream media broadcasted or published the accusations of the alternative
I would like to know why not one of these reports asked essential questions like
why anybody would try to destroy both twin towers twice at the same time when
both of the attempts are extremely difficult to realize? Where exactly would the
explosive devices be planted to demolish the buildings the way they went down?
Who might plant the explosives? How would planting the explosives possibly go
unnoticed by people who work there? Explosive experts would have to plant the
explosives exactly at the place where the planes hit the buildings or else the
collapse might start elsewhere. That means they would have to know in advance
where the jets were going to hit the buildings. This is hard to believe even if
the pilots were extremely skilled. But then if the planes hit the building
exactly where the explosives were planted, why did they not go off immediately
when the planes hit? What exactly might have triggered the presumed explosives
and how? What would determine the timing of the explosion? None of that was
questioned, analyzed, explained, or discussed, not to mention investigated,
which is way too short of a serious accusation against the government.
I enclosed one of many very shallow documentaries which try to prove that
explosive devices demolished the twin towers: WTC:
How The Towers Fell. Instead, it actually proves that the collapse of both
buildings was caused by the damage of the planes, fire, and the large weight of
The slow-motion video at 38:23 is a well-documented cheat easy to debunk. The
narrator states that the top of the building disappears in the explosion. But no
explosion is to be seen; there is no high-speed debris flying from the place of
the alleged blast. Instead, the documentary presents the implosion of the top of
the building and collapsing floors. One can see eruptions of smoke and fire
coming out from the building, but not as the result of explosions, but under the
pressure of collapsing floors. Some people believed they heard explosions in the
buildings. They were mistaken. If we throw a book on a table, it will bang.
Imagine how loud the collapse of the whole floor would bang! That was what those
The upper part of the building started imploding floor by floor at the level
where the plane hit the building. The construction below was rigid and resisted
the collapse of nearly 10 stories (see the scale in the above-linked video)
which piled on before reaching the critical weight and the kinetic energy of the
load, which the construction below could not withstand. Then the weight of the
building hammered down floor by floor the whole building to the foundations,
almost like a free fall. Yes, the construction was sturdy but not enough to
resist the power of the falling load above. The columns below bent and collapsed
like nails hit by a big hammer to a hard surface. That is all one needs to
And finally, the first building to collapse was hit second by the plane. Why?
The second building was hit lower than the first one so that the load above the
plane’s impact of the second building was more significant than the weight above
the first. The more massive pressure quickened the collapse of the building hit
second. That also indicates that the collapses were not triggered by the
This video proves that all talk of explosive use is devised fraud of false
conspiracy creators. It proves the documentary was created on purpose to accuse
the government and trick people.
The Pentagon. No camera clearly shows the Pentagon being hit by a plane.
The security cameras around the Pentagon had a speed of one snapshot per second
while the plane flew at 200 meters per second so that it escaped the camera.
That opened the door to conspiracy theorists claiming not a plane hit the
Pentagon but a missile. Again thousands of alternative media have created fake
pseudoscientific reports claiming a missile caused the Pentagon destruction. So
according to these reports, the Pentagon hit the Pentagon with a missile.
These reports did not bother to question where the missing plane was if a
missile hit the Pentagon? The attack on the Pentagon occurred at 9:45 AM.
Hundreds of people saw the plane hitting the Pentagon and not one person saw a
missile. That is the reason these reports did not bother to ask the eyewitnesses
what they saw. Even the conspiracy theory stood on extremely shaky legs; not a
seriously organized effort has been made to debunk these reports.
All these fake reports cannot cheat those who think with their heads and try to
discover the truth on their own. Some individuals fought for the fact but got
lost in a sea of fake reports. For example, Jeffrey Hill, frustrated by false
statements about the destruction of the Pentagon, conducted his own research
nine years after the incident. He searched the archive of various newspapers
trying to find the eyewitnesses statements. He found many witnesses and
interviewed them by unsolicited phone calls in which he asked them to confirm
what they saw on 9/11. After that Jeffrey Hill said: “These people did not talk
about hypotheticals based on the size of the hole in the Pentagon or the lack of
aircraft debris; they related what they saw on 9/11.” Jeffrey Hill presented the
voice recordings and his analysis here: What
really happened.”His conclusion was: “The Pentagon was hit by a plane, end
of story.” He proved it.
The Pentagon actually collapsed the same way as the twin towers even though the
load above the impact point was much smaller. The longer time under the fire
replaced the lesser destructive power of the Pentagon weight.
The WTC building 7. It is the core of the conspiracy theory because the
supporters of conspiracy theories stated such a building never collapsed due to
fire. To them, it looked like a controlled demolition, controlled demolition,
controlled demolition… repeated thousands of times in thousands of reports. In
such a way the collapse of WTC building 7 has become a controlled demolition to
a large number of people.
However, everything that these reports present is wrong. Actual future events
proved that high rise buildings do collapse in the fire. On May 13, 2008, the
13-story building of the Faculty of Architecture, at the Delft University of
Technology, Netherlands, collapsed under fire. On 19 January 2017 the 17-story
Plasco Building in Tehran, Iran, collapsed during a skyscraper fire.
one could not possibly secretly plant explosive devices in either WTC building.
First, planting explosives which can destroy the building requires a lot of time
and it cannot pass undetected by people who work there, and second, such
explosives cannot be invisible.
The collapse of WTC building 7 really looked like a controlled demolition as it
was presented in media, but that does not mean it was indeed a controlled
demolition. All these “deep analytic and scientific” documentaries about the
collapse of building 7 have “forgotten” to present that its core collapsed 7
seconds before the rest of the building. They skipped that on purpose because
this would prove that no explosive was used in the collapse of the building.
Please take a look at the following documentary: 9/11
WTC 7 Demolition - Westside Highway CBS Camera Angle at 7:24.
No controlled demolition of any building ever happened in two parts with a
7-second delay. A camera never detected explosion in building 7, nor did anybody
see it even though the building was under constant supervision before the
So what happened? Building 7 was damaged by debris flying from the North WTC
twin tower (see the picture below). It burned almost all day after being
abandoned by firefighters, which was normal after the ruin of the twin towers.
When firefighters abandoned the burning building it's collapse was just a matter
of time. The whole day fire additionally weakened the damaged steel structure of
the building. The heavy load of the building destroyed the weakest columns of
the core of the building which led to its collapse.
why did the whole building collapse? The fire did not affect the entire
building. I am an architect and engineer and will try to explain it here in a
way everyone can understand. The collapse of the core of the building together
with the broken corner disturbed the balance of the building static causing the
horizontal pressure. As a result, the whole building twisted one second before
the collapse, which is visible in the documentary. The controlled demolition
cannot cause this twist because controlled demolitions always collapse buildings
straight down. These buildings drop, they do not twist. This twist destroyed the
Steel construction is strongly resistant to axial pressures but is very weak to
bending moment stresses. Steel columns are too thin to keep resistance to big
bending forces, especially if exposed to high temperature. They act like wooden
sticks. One can easily break a stick by bending it until it snaps and that is
the only way to break it. The same happens to steel columns. When the
construction of building 7 twisted, the load of the building created big bending
moment stress to the steel columns. They bent practically without resistance and
in no time on the floor most damaged by fire. Then the building collapsed almost
in free fall as we saw. Building 7 started falling in the core slightly ahead of
the perimeters. That delay presents the horizontal speed of the collapsing
columns under the load.
So the only convincing claim of conspiracy theorists lied in the fact that the
collapse of building 7 did look like a controlled demolition, however, steel
construction buildings actually could not collapse in any other way. This is the
only way building 7 was able to collapse.
The US government could not destroy the WTC even in theory. President Bush acted
awkwardly when he was informed about 9/11 which tells me he knew nothing about
it. He would not be able to hide it if he knew. Also, I cannot even imagine how
the government would find one person in the darkest corner of the CIA willing to
kill thousands of fellow citizens. Planting explosives in the WTC would require
the engagement of a large number of people. Also, there is no guarantee they
would all keep silent. That would be entirely an impossible mission. I’ve found
that all of the accusations against the government are incredibly shallow
nonsenses leading me to conclude that we are witnessing a conspiracy against the
government, innocent of the destruction 9/11.
hope that this analysis has proved to all that conspiracy against the government
exists. OK but who are then the conspirators and why did they accuse the
government? Did the conspiracy against the US government have anything to do
with the suicidal terrorists who attacked the WTC? I think it did and I will try
to explain it here.
Only an extremely powerful organization must have organized a conspiracy against
the US government. Only the most influential capital could manage it. The
conspirators are the powerful owners of large corporations that rule over the
Western world. This capital has the interest to dominate the whole world. They
wanted to extend their power over the Middle East by using the 9/11 conspiracy.
I'll try to prove it here.
Big capital needed 9/11 to get support from the American people for aggression
on the independent Middle East countries and their conquest. All wars that took
place in the Middle East after 9/11 are the result of this conspiracy. The US
government could not profit from these aggressions, only the owners of
corporations could benefit from it. They are the ones who make money in wars.
Could the 9/11 attack be organized by the attackers alone? Was it a gift from
heaven to the owners of corporations that enabled them to attack the Middle
East? This is hardly possible. In that case, the mass-organized accusations
against the US government would not exist. The conspirators would have to wait
for an opportunity to conquer the Middle East countries and that was not
suitable for them. I believe that big capital accelerated this process by
planning the attack on the WTC. The conspiracy was born.
The conspirators could have relatively easily found people ready to destroy the
WTC in Saudi Arabia, where most suicidal terrorists come from. One agent of the
conspirators might have contacted one person in Saudi Arabia to find people
willing to commit 9/11. It should not have been a difficult task in a state full
of religious fanatics, very angry at the US for its aggressive foreign policy.
In that case, there was almost no risk for the purveyors of the attacks to be
caught. I believe the conspirators did it that way. Those suicidal fanatics most
likely received money and support to destroy the WTC. Otherwise, they would have
difficulty entering the US or attending flight school for example. But the most
rewarding thing to suicidal terrorists was pride for being chosen for such a big
task. Ironically they committed 9/11 without knowing they worked for their worst
enemies. Some information points to Saudi Arabia having something to do with
9/11, but there is strong resistance to any investigation.
The owners of corporations knew they committed a massive crime by destroying the
WTC. To hide possible traces of the crimes, they needed to frame somebody else
for it. The US government was the perfect suspect. Big capital accused the US
government of 9/11 mainly through alternative media. Massive attacks on the US
government points to a large organization that supports this conspiracy. Big
capital has done it to prevent the development of an idea which might connect
them to the crime. In other words, if big capital was not involved in 9/11,
there would be no reason for its accusations against the government. In this
case, articles which accuse the government of 9/11 would hardly exist, and
nobody would take them seriously. That fact indirectly proves big capital
committed 9/11. If the government did help the big capital in 9/11 conspiracy in
any way, big capital would accuse another innocent victim. Well, they certainly
would not blame themselves!
The government is a puppet on the strings of big capital, and big capital does
not mind accusing the government if the accusation benefits them. The owners of
corporations do it often because, in such a way the people become aware they
cannot change anything, they accept their powerlessness. Whenever people hear
that the CIA did this or that, there is no way they would ever know if the rich
did not tell them. Simply, the rich control all the means of information coming
to people. It does not matter whether the CIA did this or that, accusing the CIA
means accusing the government. The accusations have never gone to the rich who
control the government and profit from it.
Does it mean big capital plans to sacrifice the government? Of course not! It
cannot do it with such shallow accusations and also because the government is
innocent in 9/11. If under the pressure of accusations against the government,
which are paradoxically controlled by the same big capital, the investigation on
9/11 ever reopens, it would in no time find that explosives were never used and
that the government is innocent.
Then big capital would release thousands of objective reports about 9/11 in all
of the media, which right now it prevents from publishing, presenting a full
shallowness of today’s fake reports. The truth would “win”. That would tell
everyone no conspiracy ever existed, which would be false. No investigation
would ever be performed in Saudi Arabia where the suicides were engaged, and big
capital would walk free as it is used to doing after committing crimes. This is
just another deception big capital is a master at.
Part of people who accuse the government right now would not accept the truth as
Mark Twain said: “It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they
have been fooled.” Another part of those people would feel stupid and would be
ashamed for being seduced. They would become silent members of society without
any wish to rebel again. I have already become aware of it while presenting the
truth on various forums. Both of these people are useful to big capital.
Now people need to understand that the conspiracy 9/11 triggered wars worth
trillions of dollars. Not to mention how much the conspiracy would be worth to
big capital if they succeed in conquering all the countries in the Middle East.
Can one imagine how many conspiracy agents the conspirators could hire with this
amount of money? They could not have had problems finding people who would
support their conspiracy theory and say whatever the conspirators needed. The
public is already programmed not to understand anything because the media
continually present nonsense. People are so confused that they do not know what
is true and what is false anymore. I want to emphasize that the prime task of a
conspiracy is to gain profit for conspirators, but also it is important to hide
it by guiding people to the wrong track. Cheating people is the center of any
Among thousands of propagandists who accuse the government of 9/11, I believe
hundreds are paid for their job. The rest are so naive followers that they help
the conspirators for free. These people do not drop the case even 16 years after
One of the most exposed conspiracy supporters is Richard Gage, a member of the
“American Institute of Architects” and founder of Architects
& Engineers for 9/11 Truth. I can guess how he became an influenced
person. Probably he expressed his opinion somewhere publically that the
government might be responsible for 9/11. After that, he immediately got great
access to the media and lots of money to be able to distribute his opinion
wider. That attracted naive people and the conspiracy movement was born.
Dr. Juddy Wood wrote “the Towers didn’t burn up, nor did they slam to the
ground. They turned (mostly) to dust in mid-air.” She called the technology that
destroyed the twin towers a direct energy weapon but failed to say anything
about it. The readers can easily conclude that only the US government is capable
of developing such a weapon. But the dust happened just because more than 5,000
cubic meters of extra light concrete was embedded into the building floors as a
sound barrier and to prevent vibration of steel construction. The extra
light concrete instantly turned to dust under the heavy pressure of the
collapse. The shallow observation of Dr. Juddy Wood got significant access to
media and scientific lectures. The truth has much more difficulties in breaking
The conspirators control media and let corrupted and stupid people speak publicly
a lot. There is a considerable number of architects and engineers who do not
want to talk about such shallow accusations against the government. Some of them
could easily debunk the 9/11 conspiracy but do not have access to media. That is
how those who have power in society control society’s opinions.
Richard Gage allegedly leads the group of over 2,500 architects and engineers
who support the idea that the government committed 9/11. Here is one of Richard
Gage’s propaganda works: Over
2,500 architects and engineers prove 9/11 was an inside job! However, I do
not believe he was able to attract that many so-called experts because it is
impossible to find that the number of stupid or corrupted architects or
engineers. “The Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth” organization presents
pure cheat, nonsense, and pseudoscience; it is more a cult than an organization.
Their parent organization The 9/11 Truth is a
huge fake organization. This is the only organization which does not provide the
founders' names, nor the names of their leaders; it does not provide any name.
That means nobody stands behind their “truth”.
“Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth” calls for an investigation which is
supposed to uncover who is responsible behind 9/11 but I believe they do not
know that they work for these people. “The 9/11 Truth” is a non-profit
organization which cannot survive without donors. If they enclose the names of
those people who are giving them money that might lead to those people who
actually organized 9/11. The investigation just needs to follow the money.
The money would most likely lead to Jacob Rothschild unless it stops at David
Rockefeller who recently died. Anyway, they have worked together at the top of
the world conspiracy. Jacob Rothschild is a hidden leader of the Western world.
He is the owner of corporations and big capital from this article. I do not have
hard evidence against him because it is impossible to collect it without an
official investigation. My accusation is based on the fact that no one else is
powerful enough to do 9/11. I have been investigating Jacob Rothschild from the
time NATO attacked my homeland Yugoslavia and published the findings in the
Rothschild is guilty for the conspiracy against humankind.
November 5, 2017
Steel being weakened by a
jet fuel fire
7 Explained: The Tube That Crumpled
Rothschild is guilty for the conspiracy against humankind
Back to Top