3.2.2                        Association of States  

States organize the power on their territories in order to achieve more conveniences to the population. However, when the power does not suit the nature of a society, then the states conduct an alienated, autarchic, authoritative policy. Such policy creates an irrational and unstable economy of the people, an inappropriate and unjust orientation among nations, tensions and risks in relations among the states. States are responsible for the most massive bloodsheds in the history of mankind.

The state leaders are trying to put in place a more successful policy and economy than other states have. In the alienated world, the states conduct through a false impression of cooperation, a merciless fight for the political and economic domination. The USSR and the USA are a very good example of the longstanding fight of the ideologies of communism and capitalism. Both states invested enormous funds in the development in order to each present its country as a more successful. America defeated the USSR not so much thanks to the American successfulness but due to the longstanding erroneous USSR's policy that, in competing with the USA, did not care enough of the needs of its inhabitants. When the incapable leader Mikhail Gorbachev emerged, the USSR was doomed to catastrophe. The consequence of that is that the Russians live today economically worse than in the era of communism, and Russia almost has no influences to the world. As consequence the USA has now taken the right to impose its interests to the whole world. At the first place it is imposing a liberal capitalistic model that enables the richest stratum of people to rule the world, as there is nobody today able to oppose their economic power.  

The most important defect of the present-day political systems is the fact that effective power is in the hands of powerful persons. Those people have built their power by the help of the ownership of big corporations and especially by big banks. They are very well organized and fully unexposed. Moreover, they are hiding in a way that the public does not know that they rule the western world, or the whole world to a great extent. Hidden as they are, they can rule indefinitely as there is no mechanism that would take them off power.  

If we analyze the UN resolutions, we will see that most resolutions were imposed by the USA that materializes almost exclusively the interests of the rich. If we analyze the mass media, we can easily draw a conclusion that in the "free" west the information is under control. Mass media are privately owned and it is not difficult to conclude whose policy they are pursuing. The rich people impose their interests equally through daily reports, cultural and entertainment manifestations, commercials. If we analyze who gets recognitions in the world, it is easily visible that the same policy is behind all of them, the policy beneficial to the world's rich. They appoint their people to all-important functions in the world.  

State leaders of the developed world are the most exposed examples. They are trying to present the interests of their sponsors as interest of the population. If they are sufficiently successful they keep their function and if not, the people elect new leaders who will again pursue the same policy following the interests of the rich. State policies of developed countries remain pretty much the same after the changes of leadership. There is no sense in listening to state leaders, as they do not speak the truth. Their lies generate a moral crisis at the top of the state that then expands everywhere. My advice to the voters in the developed world is not to vote. Don't give legitimacy to the corrupt system. Please, boycott that fake creation until the policy allows you to really decide about your needs.      

The rich of the world make all-important decisions in the world. In order to achieve a greater economic and political power in the world, they even associate the states. They thus decided to unite Europe, the continent where antagonism among nations has been present for millennia, where in each state a different language is in use, and where different cultures and religions meet. Such an attempt seemed almost impossible, but as a result of the enormous energy employed, money invested and the propaganda of big business the uniting of Europe is materializing. Even if inhabitants of one or another European country reject in referendum the uniting, this will not stop the rich. With an additional effort they will materialize their idea in the end. In this way, the European Union is forming a single market, the parliament and government, and Europe is becoming one country.  

The unity of European countries is a good idea but it cannot be successful because it is a product of the wish of the most powerful people to take more power and control over it. All decisions important for associated states will be further made at the alienated state, ministerial and parliamentary level, which cannot help in overcoming the unfavourable orientation of the society. Since not a single present-day government is able to resolve the fundamental social problems on its respective territory, associated states will be even less capable of resolving them. Politically, it is very hard today to harmonize different national, ideological, religious, cultural, economic and other interests.  

Economically, the free market system does not have a mechanism able to establish stable frameworks of distribution of labour and of operating results. A collective state can try to accomplish stability of the system by a selective tax policy and subsidies. However, there is no objective criterion for harmonizing different interests internationally, which makes the agreement-reaching process more difficult. Free economy does not have a stable base, and any oscillation in trends represents a temptation for such a system and easily brings the economic and political crises. Associated states would be striving for their partial material interests, which will easily result in contradictions, antagonisms and splits.   

This means that the whole world will not get united soon. Inhabitants of the developed countries have been raised for generations to follow the interests of the rich, while the rest of the world with the voting right could react beyond the control of the former. Moreover, inhabitants of the developed countries have also been raised for generations to perform the highly productive work from which, needless to say, the rich have great benefits. The rest of the world would make them costs and this is the reason why the uniting of the world is for the time being impossible.  

Presently, the rich imperialists are ready to offer to the rest of the world their own dictate only and, in the best case, free market relations by setting up the World Trade Organization. The reason is simple. They will realize a larger profit on a larger market and, accordingly, the larger conveniences, with almost no obligation toward such states and nations. Less developed countries and economies cannot sufficiently compete with their products so that they will be more and more forced to allow the world's rich to cheaply buy their resources and pay small wages to the labour force. The logic is quite simple and disastrous; it is better to be hardly exploited than not be able to make any earnings on the cruel world market. The world’s rich buys companies all over the world. They do not have any more primary interest to become richer; they simply want to take control over the world. 

Each country that will try to find its own way and oppose the world’s rich will suffer not only from economic but also from political pressures. The World’s rich not only exhaust economically the less developed countries by way of providing loans and credits, they also topple governments in such countries in search for obedient leaderships, they produce civil wars in these countries in order to weaken them on a lasting basis and make the states dependant on their power. That is why one may expect many organized wars, civil wars, genocides in the third world countries and especially in countries rich with natural resources. Once the wars will have sufficiently exhausted them, the developed countries will establish the neo-colonial control.  

The powerful of the developed Western countries have the alienated, meaning insatiable, need for tailoring the world according to their will. Such policy always creates disruptions that endanger the world peace. We have been witnesses so far of the most organized attempt of establishing the control over the world. However, all attempts have up to now ended with bloody failures, and it seems that the present one will finalize in the same way if the world policy fails to change.  

There is a slight chance that such a policy could be changed inside the West itself by an organized revolt or revolution against the system. Such an option requires a big economic crisis and majority of the people without basic human rights. But the World’s powerful people have operative possibilities to prevent appearance of such a bad situation. Beside that, they may direct dissatisfaction of the people where ever they want by the help of propaganda apparatus they have under control. This option very easily leads to wars. One cannot exclude possibility for creation a strong opposition to the policy of the world’s most powerful people but this option is also weak, mostly because the people do not know who the world’s decision makers are. The people are only able to see the result of their policy and they assign it wrongfully to the exposed leaders. The strong opposition may only postpone the realization of such policy but cannot stop it. There is also a small chance that the most powerful people of the world might lower their appetites and consider the interests of the people. Unfortunately the power they develop is by its alienated nature insatiable and therefore the problems will more likely grow. Therefore the chances for stopping the aggressive policy of the world’s most powerful people in the west itself are very small. 

In history, Russia always managed to stop the raids of western imperialists despite weakened for different reasons. This imperialistic attack will not be carried out with tanks, because they mostly belong to the past, but with equally merciless economic pressures before which Russia has almost capitulated. If Russia fails to resist the cunning powerful of the west this time, that will try to do the week Europe and most likely the strong China. In alienated society the country is stronger when the authority is stronger. Please do not consider the straight of the country as advantage; the people live worse in such countries. 

China resolutely prevented the American interference with its internal affairs in connection with the events at the Tian An Men Square. There is no doubt that America, if not directly organized, helped insurrections in all socialist countries because it was the priority of the American cold war policy. Thanks to crushing the mini revolution at the Tian An Men Square, China is not disintegrated, it is not in the ruins of a civil war or a colony of the world's rich. No doubt that China could have crushed the insurrection by using a smaller power. However, it seems it has acted in this way in order to show an example to any similar attempt.  

It may be expected with great certainty that the western market economy model that China adopted will bring a great economic power to this country. It will soon become a highly respectable country of the world in economic terms, and will probably restrain the powerful clique of the west. It may be assumed that many third world countries, pressed by the exploitation of the world's rich, will seek a better life on the other side, and would like to join China forming a block of resistance to the new imperialism. Yugoslavia would certainly accept such an option if it had existed before it was attacked. Unfortunately it is quite obvious that the world is not able to perform equal rights of coexistence to the people without the power equilibrium. 

However, China does not have, as the case is in the west, any response to the economic and political problems already known in the west, and which will undoubtedly soon affect China as well. It is hard to predict what will then happen. In China, privileged party elite is ruling equally non-democratically as are the rich in the western world.  It remains to be seen if mutual problems will lead to a war or whether a sort of an insufficiently stable cold war balance of powers will be established before the alienated, corrupt or, briefly, immoral systems break apart from inside.  

The present-day world definitely does not know any model of joint coexistence that is able to ensure prosperity of the mankind. The present-day world has its relations based on a dangerous and ruthless competition of determinations, and not on cooperation. The current world policy is creating objective injustices between the states, caused by enormous differences in the level of economic development and in the right to utilizing the natural resources. On one side is the excessive production, and on the other, the famine in the world.  

The history of mankind recorded some attempts at building a better world through association. In that endeavour, world organizations were established that try to bring closer the states and nations into an interdependent whole. For this reason were established the Organization of United Nations, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the Interpol, international health organizations, and many others. It is probable that at the very outset of establishing these organizations existed an idea of creating a better planet Earth. The organizations were supposed to bring greater natural conveniences as a result of the higher degree of association of nations, labour and capital, a greater wealth of determinations, a bigger production and consumption strength and, accordingly, a greater welfare. Such organizations were supposed to reduce the possibility of emergence of war conflicts between states. However, the result is contrary to expectations. These organizations are being generally used for winning predominance in the world and represent as such a threat to the mankind.   

There is no doubt, however, that the greatest danger in the world arises from the alienation imposed by the authorities. We are living in the alienated, egocentric, narcissistic world where inhabitants are forming large alienated needs. The alienated needs in fact make an illusion to man that he can overcome his impotence before nature and, therefore, no acting is able to satisfy such needs. Both the rich and the poor suffer by this disease. Non-satisfied alienated needs represent an origin of the destructive energy, which on a daily basis brings enormous problems in the world. Authorities may easily canalize such destructive energy to make destructions in any of its parts. Of course, the most influenced people in the world are the most dangerous people of the world. As the world has not managed to overcome its alienated orientation, it has not found, either, the base for accomplishment of its own prosperity.  

Today, the world is proud of the development of technology and production, but it did not make a single step forward in the development of human consciousness. Moreover, we are entering a period of a great worldwide degradation of basic human values. In this connection, one cannot say that all negative phenomena, destructions, wars belong to the past. With the development of the technology, this problem has been raised to a higher level and is threatening the mankind more than ever before.  

***** 

The described humanistic political order can efficiently solve all of these enumerated problems. The described system adopts and develops all positive characteristics of the known socio-economic formations, and suppresses or removes the negative characteristics. It respects democracy, human rights, general and special individual interests, past and current labour and values emerging from it, natural constructive inter-personal relations, and prevents the existence of alienation, privileges, hegemony, exploitation, and any destructiveness. The new system is so much productive and elastic that inhabitants of other states can accept it. Such an act opens up a possibility of association at the level of states. Once the integration process among the states has started, then association of the associated states at the level of the entire world will just be the matter of time.  

By associating, the states lose a part of sovereignty because they assign it onto the union of states but also they realize at the same time new social life qualities. When the mankind accepts the described socio-economic system then the whole world will function as a commune. For the first time the world will exactly know, at any point of time, how many inhabitants it has and what their individual and collective needs are. For the first time it will be able to pursue a reasonable rational policy and satisfy the needs of the population.  

In such a system each inhabitant will have freedom to act on the territory of the whole world. He will have freedom to chose place to live and work to do anywhere around the world. He will be able to do it after announcement to authorized managers or after an agreement with other workers. Freedom will have one limitation. The man will not be free to make any inconvenience to any member of society. The system will develop very effective protection to each individual from inconveniences committed by any member of society.

The described system will allow each inhabitant to assess any convenience or inconvenience that he experiences coming from any point in the world. He will do it by making a direct statement in the administrative world centre or in its satellite, the commune. The system of assessments can form a completely new system of values in the world, which will valorize and sanction any inconvenience, and reward any convenience that the man can do to another man. As such assessments will directly impact the income and past labour income-based points of an evaluated man. Each man will be responsible before the whole world. He will try to produce the least possible number of inconveniences and maximum number of conveniences to the whole world, thus forming a base of the productive constructive orientation of the whole world. 

The new system envisages direct statements of all world inhabitants about the essential political, economic and other areas of joint interest. In this way, the rules of joint action in the world will be established in a direct democratic way. 

The system would form the world monetary policy and the world distribution of money. The collective money would be directly and democratically earmarked by the mankind for the world's individual consumption, collective consumption, development of the economy, and onto all partial spheres of interest.  

The new system introduces in all states a universally established value in the form of the price of labour, which objectively presents the past and current labour values of all workers in the world. Upon such values will be built the system of all other economic values that will establish a uniform, just and acceptable distribution of all forms of conveniences and inconveniences arising from the past and current labour of all workers. Those are exactly the missing elements to the European Union for the establishment of stable productive economic policy and therefore a general stability of society. 

The new economic system envisages a worldwide association of the economy into one large enterprise of the world, world leadership, world planning of the production, and world labour distribution according to the principle of free labour competition. The managers of the world will be orienting the world’s work quickly, rationally, and efficiently by the help of the computer technology already well developed today. That would form a high and stable productivity that would optimally satisfy the material needs of the entire mankind. The free labour market will abolish work privileges in the world, which will inevitably entail the planning of the production, labour distribution and distribution of operating results that optimally suit the interests of the whole mankind and of each individual inhabitant.  

Such a system will allow each inhabitant to get to know his natural needs through his own practice and in this way to overcome alienation. The possibility of expressing of each man's direct natural interest will free the society from alienated ideological, national, religious, cultural, economic and other alienated interests. Man will finally gat the chance to live his life in full and then he will not care any more about idols, alienated ideals, fetishes. The nature of the man is unique for the whole mankind and by making the man come closer to his nature the conditions will be created for forming a harmonious and homogenous social community in the entire world. 

Each man will exclusively rely on his own forces in the meeting of his own needs, and learn how to form them in accordance with his own possibilities of realization. This will represent the basis for the meeting of the needs and, consequently, of the constructive orientation of the society.  The people who permanently satisfy their needs are not destructive. Such a system will form a factual equality among peoples and the narcissistic trait of the character as the chief cause of alienation and conflicts among peoples will be overcome to the benefit of natural cooperative relations. 

In such a system, the states and nations will no longer be endangered. It may be expected that the funds intended for armed forces will be abolished by direct voting of the population, which would definitely disallow the emergence of wars.  

The proposed system will form a new consciousness of the man, new ethics of the society, and new relations in the world. Such a system will enable safety, a convenient existence, and a spiritual and material prosperity for all inhabitants of the world. Shortly, it will form Paradise on Earth. As such socio-economic system will be directly created by the mankind, the state as a form of authoritative pressure over the society will be no longer needed. 

 Back to Top